<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>toDeBlog &#187; technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://todepoint.com/blog/category/technology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://todepoint.com/blog</link>
	<description>A blog about User Interface, User Experience, Design, Flash, Product management and all that goes in between.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 08:19:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Tips on connecting blogs to Facebook</title>
		<link>http://todepoint.com/blog/2010/08/26/tips-on-connecting-blogs-to-facebook/</link>
		<comments>http://todepoint.com/blog/2010/08/26/tips-on-connecting-blogs-to-facebook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 08:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>adi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[User Experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scripting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://todepoint.com/blog/?p=130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just finished connecting my blog and few other pages on my site to Facebook, to enjoy some sharing goodness of the social community, as well as Facebook&#8217;s &#8216;insight&#8217; statistics &#8211; why not enjoy what is given for free right? I had some setbacks and strugles along the way, thought it might save you some [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just finished connecting my blog and few other pages on my site to Facebook, to enjoy some sharing goodness of the social community, as well as Facebook&#8217;s &#8216;insight&#8217; statistics &#8211; why not enjoy what is given for free right?</p>
<p>I had some setbacks and strugles along the way, thought it might save you some time (and wasted &#8216;Likes&#8217; too) to write few tips down. It will not be a full tutorial, instead I will focus on some oddities on the Facebook side:</p>
<p>First tip will be: Do not implement until you REALLY understand what your options are and what exactly you want to do. Facebook offers two main options for adding a &#8216;Like&#8217; button to your page/site/blog, one is IFRAME, second is XFBML. The iframe option is as simple as adding a line in your html source, and will get you going in seconds. The xfbml is  based on their <a href="http://developers.facebook.com/docs/reference/javascript/" target="_blank">Javascript SDK</a>, and sports the Facebook &#8216;insight&#8217; statistics via open graph, but requires few preliminary steps which are kinda tricky as the documentation is fairly sparse. Obviously we would prefer the xfbml option.</p>
<p>In order to use xfbml you will need an <strong>AppID</strong>, which require you to set up an application, to do that you will have to add the <strong>Developer application</strong> to your Facebook Profile.</p>
<p>Then, you have to <strong>activate</strong> you developer account &#8211; you have to give you cell number, after which you will receive a code via sms to submit.</p>
<p>Then you can <strong>create an application</strong> in Facebook <a href="http://www.facebook.com/developers" target="_blank" title="create a Facebook application">here</a>.<br />
* This page has a strange behavior, you will define your application name, pass a captcha and receive an Error page:<br />
<span style="color:black;">&#8220;Sorry, an error has occurred.<br />
We&#8217;re working on getting this fixed as soon as we can.&#8221;</span><br />
<img src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4122/4928377843_bbc9f1d4cf.jpg" width="450" height="200" alt="Creating Facebook application error" style="border:1px solid #ccc;" /><br />
But if you look at the column on the right in the developers page, you will see that the application was actually created:<br />
<img src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4073/4928377801_3c9db30155.jpg" width="450" height="240" alt="Facebook applications list" style="border:1px solid #ccc;" /> (Facebook, are you serious about that? is this some kind of a test?) I ended up creating about 10 applications, read countless forums threads until I found it by mistake!</p>
<p>After that you can start implementing, follow the instruction <a href="http://forum.developers.facebook.net/viewtopic.php?pid=223994" target="_blank" title="Like button XFBML tutorial">here</a>  which are pretty simple.</p>
<p>Since I thought Facebook application creation service is down, I started with the iframe version, obviously a mistake as all the &#8216;Likes&#8217; I got were dumped once I connected the xfbml. damn.</p>
<p>Good luck and may the force be with you..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://todepoint.com/blog/2010/08/26/tips-on-connecting-blogs-to-facebook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Silverlight, do I know you?</title>
		<link>http://todepoint.com/blog/2008/06/03/silverlight-do-i-know-you/</link>
		<comments>http://todepoint.com/blog/2008/06/03/silverlight-do-i-know-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 09:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AIR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://todepoint.com/blog/?p=49</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mrinal Wadhwa: Microsoft Silverlight is a browser plugin and is sort of similar to Adobe’s Flash Player and Flex Framework taken together Adobe AIR is cross platform desktop runtime that allows developers to build desktop applications using web technologies, it has no real equivalent in the Microsoft world. Peter Elst also finds it important to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://weblog.mrinalwadhwa.com/2008/05/21/adobe-air-versus-microsoft-silverlight/"><img src="http://weblog.mrinalwadhwa.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/air-vs-silverlight.jpg" width="450" height="195" alt="AIR != Silverlight" /></a><br />
<a href="http://weblog.mrinalwadhwa.com/2008/05/21/adobe-air-versus-microsoft-silverlight/" target="_blank" title="Mrinal Wadhwa about AIR and Silverlight" alt="Mrinal Wadhwa about AIR and Silverlight">Mrinal Wadhwa</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>
Microsoft Silverlight is a browser plugin and is sort of similar to Adobe’s Flash Player and Flex Framework taken together</p>
<p>Adobe AIR is cross platform desktop runtime that allows developers to build desktop applications using web technologies, it has no real equivalent in the Microsoft world.</p></blockquote>
<p>Peter Elst also <a href="http://www.peterelst.com/blog/2008/05/15/adobe-air-versus-microsoft-silverlight/" target="_blank" title="Peter Elst - Silverlight != Air" alt="Peter Elst - Silverlight != Air">finds it important to differentiate</a>..</p>
<p>So many people ask me &#8211; &#8220;How is Silverlight?&#8221; or &#8220;Is Silverlight a real threat to Flash?&#8221;.. well, I never even tried Silverlight. (I did install the plugin, but simply never got to a website that uses Silverlight..)<br />
So the only answer I can give is: when aiming at the web industry (us developers), such a difference in user/client perception must result in different adoption trends, evident: I did not try.. but the logo looks kinda cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://todepoint.com/blog/2008/06/03/silverlight-do-i-know-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The technological edge myth</title>
		<link>http://todepoint.com/blog/2007/02/07/the-technological-edge-myth/</link>
		<comments>http://todepoint.com/blog/2007/02/07/the-technological-edge-myth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 12:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[User Experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[startups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://todepoint.com/blog/?p=15</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dealing with ideas and startups, we get to talk with entrepreneurs, VCs and BizDev guys, very often we are asked what is the technological edge in the idea? what will differentiate it from imitations and prevent competitors from copying the idea? hmm, how about nothing? In todays reality, what makes a product hot often has [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/todepoint/382677293/" title="Can you do that?"><img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/160/382677293_238bc5d79c_o.jpg" width="450" height="168" alt="cat.jpg" /></a></p>
<p>Dealing with ideas and startups, we get to talk with entrepreneurs, VCs and BizDev guys, very often we are asked what is the technological edge in the idea? what will differentiate it from imitations and prevent competitors from copying the idea? hmm, how about nothing?</p>
<p>In todays reality, what makes a product hot often has nothing to do with pioneering technology, what was Flickr&#8217;s technological edge? what was YouTube&#8217;s?  yes, yes, I know, both these examples have deep technological aspects in their solution/product/service, but Flickr really did not invent something new in terms of technology, neither did YouTube. for each example I can name a better reason for succeeding other than a technological edge, mainly Timing, face it, many of those web2.0 companies are really implementing OLD ideas, in a better circumstances, as today the users are more willing to accept &#038; participate in &#8220;advanced&#8221; concepts.</p>
<p>So what is the importance of a <b>technological</b> edge in the chances of a new idea to succeed ?</p>
<p>Since It is simply not necessary today to have huge development departments in order to make applications people want, it is time to omit the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technology">technology</a> from the phrase &#8211; the <b>edge</b> may be the user experience in your product (e.g. iPod), integrating well with other services (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mashup_(web_application_hybrid)">mashup</a>), or being open for enhancements from third party players (open <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/API">API</a>), and more important &#8211; successfully integrating these in your business plans &#038; objectives.</p>
<p>I value the user experience the most because this is what counts for users at the end, I use Flickr, Skype, de.icio.us, because it is easy and convenient, not because they use this platform and not another, and this counts for success &#8211; how many users are actually using it, and what impact it has on our life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://todepoint.com/blog/2007/02/07/the-technological-edge-myth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
